Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct vs NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B-BF16

Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct (80.4B parameters) and NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B-BF16 (123.6B parameters) side by side: the memory each needs at every precision, what it costs to run on a live GPU, and the context window, KV cache and license where they are published. Numbers are computed from the models' published specs; this page does not rank quality.

Side by side

FactHunyuan-A13B-InstructNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B-BF16
Parameters80.4B123.6B
ArchitectureGrouped-query attention; mixture of 64 expertsHybrid (some layers use full attention); mixture of 512 experts, 22 active per token
Context length32,768 tokens262,144 tokens
License––
Published precisionBF16BF16
VRAM needed, As published180 GB276 GB
VRAM needed, FP889.8 GB138 GB
VRAM needed, INT444.9 GB69.1 GB
Cheapest live fit, As publishedRTX A5000 × 8 · $1.41/hrRTX A6000 × 6 · $2.18/hr
Cheapest live fit, FP8RTX PRO 6000 · $1.38/hrRTX 4000 SFF Ada × 7 · $1.39/hr
Cheapest live fit, INT4RTX A6000 · $0.363/hrA100 · $1.21/hr
KV cache per token (16-bit)128 KB8 KB
KV cache at 32k tokens4.00 GB0.25 GB
KV cache at 128k tokens16.0 GB1.00 GB

VRAM is the weight size at each precision times a flat 1.2 overhead; see the methodology. The FP8 and INT4 rows need a quantized checkpoint or an engine that quantizes on load. The fit is the lowest-priced single GPU type that holds the model at that precision, or the lowest-priced multi-GPU set (up to 8) when none does. KV cache is for one sequence at 16-bit, computed from each model's config where the attention layout is known.

Which to pick

  • Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct needs less VRAM at its published precision (180 GB against 276 GB), so it fits on a smaller GPU.
  • NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B-BF16 lists the longer context window (262,144 tokens against 32,768).
  • NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B-BF16 caches less per sequence at 32k tokens (0.3 GB against 4.0 GB), leaving more memory for batching.
  • Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct has the cheaper live GPU fit at its published precision ($1.41/hr against $2.18/hr).

These follow only from the facts in the table above. Whether either model does your task well is a separate question this page does not answer.

Keep reading

Other comparisons

Submit the job. Everything after that is ours.

Sign up in 60 seconds. Pay for the GPU minutes you actually use.

© 2026 Aquanode. All rights reserved.

All trademarks, logos and brand names are the property of their respective owners.