What GPU do I need to run nvidia/Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-8B?
8.0B parameters, published in F16. View on Hugging Face
Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-8B is published by nvidia on Hugging Face, with 10,513 downloads and 555 likes to date. It's a LlamaForCausalLM model built for text-generation, published natively in F16.
VRAM required & cheapest live GPU fit
Required VRAM = weight size at each precision times a flat 1.2 overhead for activations and fragmentation. The KV-cache grows with context and is not in that factor; it is listed per model below where the architecture is published. Full formula and assumptions: methodology.
| Precision | Weight size | Required VRAM | Cheapest live fit | GPUs needed | Est. $/hr (full fit) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP16 | 15.0 GB | 17.9 GB | RTX A5000 | 1 | $0.176/hr |
| FP8 (quantized) | 7.5 GB | 9.0 GB | RTX 4070 Super | 1 | $0.121/hr |
| INT4 (quantized) | 3.7 GB | 4.5 GB | RTX 3060 | 1 | $0.110/hr |
A GPU is only matched to a row if its hardware supports that precision, and the primary recommendation is always a single-GPU fit when one exists.
INT4 requires a quantized checkpoint actually published for this model, check its Hugging Face page before relying on this row.
Cheapest way to run Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-8B at its published (F16) precision: 1× RTX A5000, at $0.176/hr per GPU ($0.176/hr total). Quantizing to FP8 or INT4 (rows above) can cost less, but requires a compatible quantized checkpoint to exist for this model.
Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-8B: KV cache by context length
The KV cache is the memory the attention layers hold for every token of context, on top of the weights. It is not part of the flat 1.2x overhead in the table above, grows with context length and with every concurrent request, and is why a long-context deployment needs more VRAM than the table shows.
Grouped-query attention: every layer caches keys and values for a few shared KV heads. Cached per token: 131,072 bytes at 16-bit.
| Context | KV cache, one sequence |
|---|---|
| 4K | 0.50 GB |
| 8K (model maximum) | 1.0 GB |
Computed from the layer, head and window counts in the model's own configuration (nvidia/Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-8B), at 16 bits per cached value. Each concurrent sequence needs its own cache, on top of the weights.
Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-8B: common questions
Does Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-8B fit on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. At FP16 it needs 17.9 GB of VRAM, so a 24 GB card holds it with 6.1 GB to spare. A 16 GB card is not enough for it at FP16.
What is the least VRAM Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-8B can run in?
4.5 GB, at INT4 (quantized), which fits a 6 GB card, against 17.9 GB at FP16. That row assumes an INT4 checkpoint has actually been published for this model, so check its Hugging Face page before planning around it.
Does quantizing Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-8B lower the GPU bill?
Yes. At FP16 the cheapest live fit is one RTX A5000 at $0.176/hr. At INT4 (quantized) it drops to one RTX 3060 at $0.110/hr, provided a quantized checkpoint exists for it.
Weight-to-VRAM math, the fit rules, and how live prices are normalized: full methodology.
More Llama 3 models
- Meta-Llama-3-8B-Instruct (8.0B, BF16)
- Meta-Llama-3-8B (8.0B, BF16)
- Llama-3-8B-UltraMedical (8.0B, BF16)
- Llama-3-8B-Instruct-Gradient-1048k (8.0B, BF16)
- llama-3-8b-Instruct (8.0B, BF16)
Alternatives at this size
Other models for text-generation within about a third of Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-8B's 8.0B parameters, from other model lines.
- Qwen3-8B (8.2B, BF16)
- Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 (7.2B, BF16)
- granite-4.1-8b (8.8B, BF16)
- DeepSeek-R1-0528-Qwen3-8B (8.2B, BF16)
- gemma-2-9b-it (9.2B, BF16)
More on Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-8B
Fits on a 24 GB GPU at FP16: every model that fits in 24 GB.
Fits on a 12 GB GPU at FP8: every model that fits in 12 GB.
Fits on an 8 GB GPU at INT4: every model that fits in 8 GB.
Related reading: RTX A5000 pricing and specs, How much VRAM you need for LLMs, Serving LLMs with vLLM, vLLM vs TensorRT-LLM vs SGLang, Best GPU for LLM inference, and What AI model fine-tuning is.